{ "version": "https://jsonfeed.org/version/1", "title": "Inverness Park (EN)", "description": "", "home_page_url": "https://www.inverness-park.com", "feed_url": "https://www.inverness-park.com/feed.json", "user_comment": "", "author": { "name": "Inverness Park" }, "items": [ { "id": "https://www.inverness-park.com/go-live-of-dros-at-chinalco-toromocho-peru.html", "url": "https://www.inverness-park.com/go-live-of-dros-at-chinalco-toromocho-peru.html", "title": "Go-live of dROS at Chinalco Toromocho - Peru", "summary": "Go-live of dROS at Chinalco Toromocho - Peru October 24, 2025 • By Stephan Marcotte Inverness Park is proud to announce the successful deployment of the Desktop Remote Operating Station (dROS) at the Toromocho Mine (Chinalco) in Peru. Today marks the start of a three-month…", "content_html": "
\n
\n
\n

Go-live of dROS at Chinalco Toromocho - Peru

\n

October 24, 2025 • By Stephan Marcotte

\n
\n
\n\n

Inverness Park is proud to announce the successful deployment of the Desktop Remote Operating Station (dROS) at the Toromocho Mine (Chinalco) in Peru.

\n

Today marks the start of a three-month validation pilot program during which an electric drill will be operated remotely from Lima. This completes a major milestone for customer Peck Tech Solutions Ltd. (a Caterpillar company), which, in collaboration with Ferreyros (a Ferreycorp company), has deployed its first S-ADS + dROS (Electric Drill) system in South America.

\n

The Power of dROS and Remote Operation

\n

The dROS software allows an operator to interact with all onboard systems on Caterpillar’s MD6640 large blasthole drill (formerly the Bucyrus Erie 49R). dROS connects to Peck Tech’s onboard Drill Control Interface (DCI), an autonomous drilling platform that acts as a machine-specific layer between Caterpillar’s Autonomous Drilling System (ADS) and non-OEM drill platforms.

\n

This dROS-DCI interaction allows an operator to remotely operate the drill in difficult terrain in the event that the ADS cannot complete its autonomous missions.

\n
\n

Key Advantages of dROS

\n\n
\n
\n

\"Ideally, the operator should only ever need to set up ADS missions and then just sit back and monitor progress. But difficult terrain will often stop ADS and require direct intervention by the operator.\"

\n— Stephan Marcotte, Founder of Inverness Park
\n

From UI Mockups to Field Success

\n

In 2020, Inverness Park was hired by Peck Tech to design and develop the dROS office-side software, starting from nothing more than user interface mockups. True to its reputation for rapid development and field deployment excellence, Inverness Park produced the first prototype in just three to four months.

\n
\n

\"The COVID crisis imposed delays on the project, and the price of iron ore at the time forced the temporary closure of the Bloom Lake mine. Fortunately, we got the go-ahead to deploy in the summer of 2023. And by November, we had a drill remotely drilling inside the 300m-1000m zone of a blast for the first time in the mine's history.\"

\n— Stephan Marcotte
\n

Setting the New Standard

\n

The deployment of dROS at Toromocho, culminating in the bold step of moving the Remote Operating Station 200 kilometers away to Lima, is more than just a successful contract — it’s a powerful validation of next-generation remote operation.

\n

This implementation proves that the future of blasthole drilling can be safer, more efficient, and independent of geographical constraints, minimizing exposure to hazardous mine environments while maximizing productivity. Inverness Park and Peck Tech Solutions are setting the new standard for truly decentralized, reliable mining operations across the Americas.

\n
", "image": "https://www.inverness-park.com/media/posts/6/dROS-station.jpg", "author": { "name": "Inverness Park" }, "tags": [ "Blog" ], "date_published": "2026-10-02T11:32:05-06:00", "date_modified": "2026-10-02T14:21:51-06:00" }, { "id": "https://www.inverness-park.com/inverness-park-wins-contract-to-deploy-dros-at-chinalcos-toromocho-mine-in-peru.html", "url": "https://www.inverness-park.com/inverness-park-wins-contract-to-deploy-dros-at-chinalcos-toromocho-mine-in-peru.html", "title": "Inverness Park Wins Contract to Deploy dROS at Chinalco’s Toromocho Mine in Peru", "summary": "Inverness Park Wins Contract to Deploy dROS at Chinalco’s Toromocho Mine in Peru Published on May 25, 2025 • By Stephan Marcotte Inverness Park has been selected by Peck Tech Solutions Ltd. (a Caterpillar company) to deploy its dROS (Desktop Remote Operating Station) software at…", "content_html": "
\n
\n
\n

Inverness Park Wins Contract to Deploy dROS at Chinalco’s Toromocho Mine in Peru

\n

Published on May 25, 2025 • By Stephan Marcotte

\n
\n
\n\n

Inverness Park has been selected by Peck Tech Solutions Ltd. (a Caterpillar company) to deploy its dROS (Desktop Remote Operating Station) software at Chinalco's Toromocho Mine in Peru.

\n

This deployment marks the second major mine site for dROS, following its successful implementation at Quebec Iron Ore's Bloom Lake in 2024, after initial field trials in the Fall of 2023.

\n

The Power of dROS and Remote Operation

\n

The dROS software allows an operator to interact with all onboard systems on Caterpillar’s MD6640 large blasthole drill (formerly the Bucyrus Erie 49R). dROS connects to Peck Tech’s onboard Drill Control Interface (DCI), an autonomous drilling platform that acts as a machine-specific layer between Caterpillar’s Autonomous Drilling System (ADS) and non-OEM drill platforms.

\n

This dROS-DCI interaction allows an operator to remotely operate the drill in difficult terrain in the event that the ADS cannot complete its autonomous missions. Key operational highlights include:

\n
\n

Key Advantages of dROS

\n\n
\n
\n

\"Ideally, the operator should only ever need to set up ADS missions and then just sit back and monitor progress. But difficult terrain will often stop ADS and require direct intervention by the operator.\"

\n— Stephan Marcotte, Founder of Inverness Park
\n

From UI Mockups to Field Success

\n

In 2020, Inverness Park was hired by Peck Tech to design and develop the dROS office-side software, starting from nothing more than initial user interface mockups. True to its reputation for rapid development and field deployment excellence, Inverness Park produced the functional prototype in just three to four months.

\n

Despite project delays during COVID-19 and market fluctuations at Bloom Lake, the project received the go-ahead in summer 2023. By November 2023, the team successfully operated a drill remotely inside the 300m–1000m blast safety zone for the first time in the mine's history.

\n

The Next Phase: Remote-from-Distance

\n

The Toromocho deployment effort is scheduled to start in late June and reach completion in August. Starting in September, the next phase will consist of deploying dROS in Lima, roughly 200km away from the mine site.

\n
\n

A First for Long-Distance Remote Operation

\n

Operating a drill 200 kilometers away from the pit represents a major technological milestone for Peck Tech. Inverness Park's confidence stems from decades of experience building software specifically optimized for open-pit wireless networks that suffer from severe bandwidth and availability constraints.

\n
\n
\n

\"dROS was designed for remote operation in modern networks.\"

\n— Stephan Marcotte
\n

Setting the New Standard

\n

Moving the Remote Operating Station 200 kilometers away to Lima is more than a successful contract — it is a powerful validation of next-generation remote operation. It proves that the future of heavy industrial drilling can be safer, more efficient, and independent of geographical constraints.

\n
", "image": "https://www.inverness-park.com/media/posts/5/IMG_5136.jpg", "author": { "name": "Inverness Park" }, "tags": [ "Blog" ], "date_published": "2026-10-02T11:31:30-06:00", "date_modified": "2026-10-02T14:41:10-06:00" }, { "id": "https://www.inverness-park.com/life-after-a-merger-how-a-strategic-advisor-can-help-your-mining-tech-company.html", "url": "https://www.inverness-park.com/life-after-a-merger-how-a-strategic-advisor-can-help-your-mining-tech-company.html", "title": "Life After a Merger: How a Strategic Advisor Can Help Your Mining Tech Company", "summary": "Life After a Merger: How a Strategic Advisor Can Help Your Mining Tech Company Published on January 31, 2025 • By Stephan Marcotte The mining technology sector is no stranger to mergers and acquisitions (M&A). Like many other industries, it’s been on a consolidation trend,…", "content_html": "
\n
\n
\n

Life After a Merger: How a Strategic Advisor Can Help Your Mining Tech Company

\n

Published on January 31, 2025 • By Stephan Marcotte

\n
\n
\n\n

The mining technology sector is no stranger to mergers and acquisitions (M&A). Like many other industries, it’s been on a consolidation trend, particularly with acquisitions. Stephan Marcotte, consultant and founder of Inverness Park, estimates that hundreds of acquisitions have occurred in the last 10 years.

\n

There’s no sign of that slowing down. In its outlook, InvestMETS anticipates deal flow for mining tech set to rise, driven by the mining industry’s appetite for innovation and digital acceleration. Strategic partnerships between the tech sector and mining operations will be critical.

\n

If your mining tech organization is considering a merger or acquisition this year, you’re probably focused on the transaction. But what happens on day 1 and beyond? That’s when reality kicks in — post-merger integration is where companies face their biggest challenges.

\n

Post-Merger Pain Points

\n

The true work of a merger or acquisition begins when teams from both companies are brought together. It’s not just about consolidating assets and finding a desk for everybody; it’s about aligning two groups that may have very different technologies, workflows, and cultures.

\n
\n
\n

1. Resistance to Change

\n

People tend to be change-averse, especially when fearing job redundancy. Employees of the acquired company face massive shifts in systems, leadership, and communication styles.

\n
\"Rarely is anyone ever happy about it.\"
— Stephan Marcotte
\n
\n
\n

2. Unrealistic Expectations

\n

Expecting an acquired team to immediately adapt and fall in line is a major mistake. Ignoring their experience deprives your company of better processes and leads to disengagement or resignations.

\n
\n
\n

3. Culture Differences

\n

Cultural integration often takes a back seat to financial goals. Acquired companies are often smaller, scrappier teams that can feel alienated by larger corporate cultures.

\n
\n
\n

4. Technological Misalignment

\n

Differences in tech stacks and data management systems can take months or years to resolve.

\n
\"Decision-makers heading up the deal don’t necessarily understand that level of technical complexity.\"
— Stephan Marcotte
\n
\n
\n

How a Strategic Advisor Streamlines Integration

\n

External advisors bring key advantages over internal oversight, ensuring a smooth, efficient integration process while freeing up your core team.

\n
\n

Support Change Management

\n

Managing change requires hands-on guidance. When founders and engineers of an acquired company suddenly feel like \"just another number,\" personalities collide and product visions clash. An outside, neutral party free from internal bias is uniquely positioned to mediate, build trust, and establish unified workflows.

\n
\n
\n

Develop and Refine the Tech

\n

Acquiring IP is a primary driver of M&A, but if you haven't done technical due diligence up-front, post-merger surprises are common. External software specialists can evaluate what you actually own, pinpoint missing links, solve data-sharing roadblocks across disparate systems, and build custom bridges between legacy platforms.

\n
\n

\"Deploying is where everybody struggles.\"

\n

With over 30 years of industry experience, Inverness Park helps companies step back, evaluate limitations, and chart realistic technical roadmaps for field deployment.

\n
\n
\n
\n

Focus Exclusively on Setting You Up for Success

\n

Unlike internal managers balancing integration off the sides of their desks, strategic advisors hit the ground running with a single focus. Hands-on consultants become an extension of your engineering team, helping deliver faster while keeping long-term scalability in view.

\n
\n

Conclusion

\n

While acquiring a company brings immense potential for growth, the real value is unlocked only through successful integration. Investing in proper technical due diligence, change management, and cultural alignment from day one ensures your M&A delivers on its promises.

\n
", "image": "https://www.inverness-park.com/media/posts/4/MnA.png", "author": { "name": "Inverness Park" }, "tags": [ "Blog" ], "date_published": "2026-10-02T11:30:51-06:00", "date_modified": "2026-10-02T14:41:20-06:00" }, { "id": "https://www.inverness-park.com/the-tech-talent-conundrum-a-mining-industry-perspective.html", "url": "https://www.inverness-park.com/the-tech-talent-conundrum-a-mining-industry-perspective.html", "title": "The Tech Talent Conundrum: A Mining Industry Perspective", "summary": "The Tech Talent Conundrum: A Mining Industry Perspective Published on April 3, 2025 • By Stephan Marcotte The mining industry, once a bastion of traditional practices, is undergoing a rapid digital transformation. To stay competitive, mining companies are investing heavily in cutting-edge technologies like AI,…", "content_html": "
\n
\n
\n

The Tech Talent Conundrum: A Mining Industry Perspective

\n

Published on April 3, 2025 • By Stephan Marcotte

\n
\n
\n\n

The mining industry, once a bastion of traditional practices, is undergoing a rapid digital transformation. To stay competitive, mining companies are investing heavily in cutting-edge technologies like AI, IoT, and automation.

\n

Often, they turn to hiring highly skilled tech companies to do that work. For those tech companies, investing in the right people to develop and implement that technology is essential — but attracting and retaining top tech talent to work in the mining sector presents unique challenges.

\n

Building an In-House Team is Challenging

\n

Many mining operations are located in remote areas, far from the urban centers where tech talent is in abundant supply. For tech companies supplying experts, this geographic disparity makes it difficult to attract skilled tech professionals who might naturally prefer the convenience, opportunities, and lifestyle that come with being deployed to an urban client.

\n

Another obstacle is the scarcity of professionals possessing the specialized skill sets required by a mining operation. The pool shrinks even further when searching for candidates with that unique blend of deep technical skill and domain-specific mining knowledge.

\n
\n

Key In-House Hurdles

\n\n
\n

The Power of Specialized Consulting Firms

\n

Partnering with specialized consulting firms can be a game-changer for tech companies, giving them immediate access to experts with years of hands-on experience in the mining sector. It’s a shortcut to a flexible workforce that can be rapidly deployed around specific project needs.

\n
\n

Strategic Advantages of External Experts

\n\n
\n

Choosing the Right Consulting Firm

\n

When selecting a consulting firm to partner with on mining projects, tech companies should evaluate partners based on five key pillars:

\n
\n
\n

1. Domain Expertise

\n

Look for a firm with a proven, verifiable track record specifically within mining operations.

\n
\n
\n

2. Technical Proficiency

\n

Confirm the firm possesses the modern software and engineering skills required to execute complex builds.

\n
\n
\n

3. Client References

\n

Assess past performance, industry reputation, and references from stakeholders.

\n
\n
\n

4. Communication & Cost

\n

Ensure strong cultural alignment, transparent collaboration, and a pricing model that fits your budget.

\n
\n
\n

Accelerating Innovation

\n

By partnering with the right consulting firm, tech companies can bypass the friction of attracting and retaining niche talent, allowing them to focus on what matters most: accelerating innovation and driving sustainable growth for their mining clients.

\n
", "image": "https://www.inverness-park.com/media/posts/3/bg-mountains.jpeg", "author": { "name": "Inverness Park" }, "tags": [ "Blog" ], "date_published": "2026-10-02T11:30:11-06:00", "date_modified": "2026-10-02T14:41:33-06:00" }, { "id": "https://www.inverness-park.com/the-cost-of-fixing-outsourced-code-why-cutting-corners-in-software-engineering-never-pays-off.html", "url": "https://www.inverness-park.com/the-cost-of-fixing-outsourced-code-why-cutting-corners-in-software-engineering-never-pays-off.html", "title": "The Cost of Fixing Outsourced Code: Why Cutting Corners in Software Engineering Never Pays Off", "summary": "The Cost of Fixing Outsourced Code: Why Cutting Corners in Software Engineering Never Pays Off Published on January 1, 2025 • By Stephan Marcotte In the world of software development, outsourcing has long been seen as a way to reduce costs, accelerate delivery, and access…", "content_html": "
\n
\n
\n

The Cost of Fixing Outsourced Code: Why Cutting Corners in Software Engineering Never Pays Off

\n

Published on January 1, 2025 • By Stephan Marcotte

\n
\n
\n\n

In the world of software development, outsourcing has long been seen as a way to reduce costs, accelerate delivery, and access global talent. But as many companies have learned the hard way, opting for the lowest cost outsourcing team can be a recipe for disaster. While the initial savings might look appealing, the hidden costs of fixing poorly written, buggy, and unreliable code can far outweigh the benefits.

\n

In this post, we’ll explore how this common mistake unfolds, the impact on businesses, and the tough choices decision makers are left with when they realize they've been burned by a cheap outsourcing solution.

\n

The Pitfalls of Cheap Outsourcing

\n

At first glance, outsourcing to a low-cost team may seem like the perfect solution for startups and companies looking to scale quickly while keeping costs down. The logic is simple: hire a cheap team, pay less, and get the job done. But this strategy often overlooks one critical factor: the quality of the work.

\n

Many of these outsourced teams are simply fronts for code farms — large, low-wage operations that often prioritize quantity over quality. These teams typically rely on inexperienced developers or junior coders who may lack the expertise necessary to deliver robust, maintainable software.

\n

Common Issues in Outsourced Code

\n\n

As the codebase grows and new features are added, these issues compound. The technical debt starts piling up, and suddenly, what seemed like a cheap and efficient solution begins to look more like a costly burden.

\n

The Choices Facing Decision Makers

\n

When a company is faced with the reality of having outsourced their software development to a low-cost team, they are often left with a few painful choices:

\n
\n

1. Stick with the Current Team (Sunk Cost Fallacy)

\n

The sunk cost fallacy is the natural tendency to keep throwing resources into a failing project because so much has already been invested. When faced with a buggy, unstable codebase, some decision makers choose to continue down this path, hoping that with enough time and money, the problems will eventually resolve themselves.

\n

In software development, this approach is often a trap. As more time is spent trying to fix the issues, more resources are wasted on a codebase that is fundamentally flawed. The lack of support from the outsourcing team makes it even harder to get back on track.

\n
\n
\n

2. Hire a More Experienced Consultancy to Fix the Mess

\n

Hiring a more experienced consultancy to fix the mess left behind by a low-cost outsourcing team may seem like a sensible next step. However, what many decision makers don’t realize is that the most reputable consultancies will often refuse to \"just fix\" the existing code. They recognize that the best way to solve long-term issues is to re-engineer the entire codebase properly.

\n
\n

Why Consultants Avoid ‘Just Fixing’ Outsourced Code

\n
    \n
  • Unpredictability and risk: Patching up bad code without addressing architectural issues is like putting a band-aid on a broken arm. The system remains fragile and prone to future breakdowns.
    • \n
  • Long-term sustainability: Properly re-engineering the code ensures the system is stable, maintainable, and scalable.
    • \n
  • Reputation and accountability: Reputable consultancies build their brand on high-quality solutions and prefer to rebuild properly rather than risk delivering a subpar product.
    • \n
\n
\n
\n
\n

3. Start Over with a More Experienced, Nearshore Consultancy

\n

For some decision makers, the most effective path may be to simply scrap the outsourced code and start fresh with a more experienced consultancy, possibly with nearshoring as an option. Nearshoring offers a compromise between cost and quality, with closer time zones and cultural alignment making communication much easier.

\n

Starting from scratch may sound drastic, but it can save companies from endless firefighting and rework down the line.

\n
\n

Why Cutting Corners in Software Engineering Never Pays Off

\n

Software is arguably one of the most fragile engineering disciplines due to its ever-evolving nature and its inherent flexibility. Unlike mechanical or civil engineering, where materials and systems are relatively static, software constantly changes and adapts to new requirements.

\n
\n
\n

For Startups

\n

Software is often the core product. A buggy codebase severely damages customer trust, hinders growth, and stymies funding opportunities. Every bit of technical debt accumulated early on is a ticking time bomb.

\n
\n
\n

For Established Tech Firms

\n

The risks are even higher due to complex systems and strict regulations. Poor software can:

\n
    \n
  • Compromise security: Exposing firms to data breaches and regulatory fines.
    • \n
  • Hinder innovation: Creating bottlenecks that delay feature development.
    • \n
  • Damage reputation: Outages erode customer confidence and brand value.
    • \n
  • Create compliance risks: Leading to expensive legal and regulatory friction.
    • \n
\n
\n
\n

Conclusion: The True Cost of Outsourcing

\n

When considering outsourcing, decision makers must balance immediate financial benefits with the long-term risks. While outsourcing to the cheapest provider offers short-term savings, fixing the resulting mess costs far more.

\n
\n

\"You get what you pay for. In software engineering, skimping on quality can cost you much more than you ever imagined.\"

\n
\n
", "image": "https://www.inverness-park.com/media/posts/2/Designer.jpeg", "author": { "name": "Inverness Park" }, "tags": [ "Blog" ], "date_published": "2026-10-02T11:28:57-06:00", "date_modified": "2026-10-02T14:41:44-06:00" } ] }